We return again to our driven pendulum. This time, we consider what happens when the pendulum is near the upright vertical position, θ=π, the unstable equilibrium of the undriven pendulum. To do this, let us denote a new angle measure , so that
measures the angle from the upright vertical. Then
,
, and in terms of
, the equation of motion
becomes
;
and for small , this is approximated by
.
Now, one might expect that the pendulum will fall over, as it does in the undriven case. After all, the tangential acceleration, , appears like it should average over a cycle to
, a positive quantity. However, this reasoning is incorrect in one important way: recall the “wiggle” in θ, and thus in
, due to the driving, and also proportional to a
. By examination, we see that when the pivot is accelerating upward,
will be driven to increase, and a downward acceleration will produce the part of the wiggle decreasing (or slowing the increase in)
.

Thus, the in the driving term of the acceleration
will contain a cosine term, so the above will have a cosine squared term, which, like in our previous rapid ω, small α approximation, will have a nonzero average. In fact, we see that due to the wiggle,
will be slightly larger when the driving acceleration is towards lower
, and thus this will have a greater effect than when the driving is in the opposite direction, and
is slightly smaller. Thus, if ω is large enough, then the net effect of the driving is a restoring force stronger than gravity, and one gets the pendulum oscillating about the upright vertical, with a small wiggle superimposed!
Working as we did in our approximation here, we try for an approximate solution of the form , where b(t) and c(t) are functions whose variation over time is much slower that the “wiggle”, so that on a time-scale of
, with
, we can ignore their time dependence and treat them like constants; we also expect b to be much smaller than c (as it represents the “wiggle”).
As before, we substitute into our equation of motion:
.
Now, with , and rapid enough driving that
, we can, as before, ignore the
term to get
.
Which, to leading order, tels us that , so
, and so our approximate solution is
.
From our equation of motion, we have acceleration of φ given by
.
Now, taking the average over a period of the driving (), we see that in the product
, we will have four terms; the constant term
will obviously average to itself, while the two cosine terms will each average to zero, and since the average of
over one of its periods is 1/2, the fourth term,
will have average
. Lastly, c(t) is approximately constant on this timescale.
Therefore,
.
Suppose that , so that the quantity in brackets is positive. Assuming this is true, then define
. Then
.
But from , we see that on the timescale we are averaging,
, and so we have
,
which is (in the approximation) simple harmonic motion of frequency
.
Now, for this to happen, we noted that must be real. With
, we see then that to have
, we need
, as was assumed earlier.
Note that if (instead of just
), then
.
Thus, in this approximation, our pendulum swings with a frequency ; with a small wiggle of frequency
superimposed. We also note that the amplitude of the “wiggle” is proportional to the current angle about which it is wiggling, being smaller by a factor of
, creating behavior similar to that here, except with a distinctly different
, and with a wiggle of opposite phase.
Tags: Approximation, Friday Physics, Pendulum, physics