<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Twisted One 151's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 15: Hydrostatics by Physics Friday 96 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/physics-friday-15-hydrostatics/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 96 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=273#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday&#160;96 By twistedone151  Suppose, as in this post, we have a fluid of density &#961;, with some arbitrary three-dimensional object immersed in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday&nbsp;96 By twistedone151  Suppose, as in this post, we have a fluid of density &rho;, with some arbitrary three-dimensional object immersed in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 94 by Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/monday-math-94/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/monday-math-94/#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>[...] that is nonzero only for , p prime and k a positive integer; in that case, . Thus .  Now, using the relationship between Dirichlet convolution and Dirichlet series, we have that the Dirichlet series generating function for  is thus the product of those for f-1(n) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that is nonzero only for , p prime and k a positive integer; in that case, . Thus .  Now, using the relationship between Dirichlet convolution and Dirichlet series, we have that the Dirichlet series generating function for  is thus the product of those for f-1(n) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 93 by Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/monday-math-93/#comment-1816</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/monday-math-93/#comment-1816</guid>
		<description>[...] is also zero in that case. Now, for n&gt;1 with prime factorization , we have , with . I showed here that the Dirichlet inverse f-1(n) of a completely multiplicative function f(n) is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also zero in that case. Now, for n&gt;1 with prime factorization , we have , with . I showed here that the Dirichlet inverse f-1(n) of a completely multiplicative function f(n) is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 92 by Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/monday-math-92/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1730#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>[...] convolution, (&#923;*1)(n)=ln(n). Note that since &#923;(1)=0, the von Mangoldt function has no Dirichlet inverse.  Now, let us consider a completely multiplicative function f(n), with Dirichlet inverse f-1(n), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] convolution, (&Lambda;*1)(n)=ln(n). Note that since &Lambda;(1)=0, the von Mangoldt function has no Dirichlet inverse.  Now, let us consider a completely multiplicative function f(n), with Dirichlet inverse f-1(n), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 91 by Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/monday-math-91/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/monday-math-91/#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>[...] function is non-zero are , , with . There are ki terms for each pi, so , or in terms of the Dirichlet convolution, (&#923;*1)(n)=ln(n). Note that since &#923;(1)=0, the von Mangoldt function has no Dirichlet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] function is non-zero are , , with . There are ki terms for each pi, so , or in terms of the Dirichlet convolution, (&Lambda;*1)(n)=ln(n). Note that since &Lambda;(1)=0, the von Mangoldt function has no Dirichlet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 2: Symmetry and Integrals by Physics Friday 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/monday-math-2-symmetry-and-integrals/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/monday-math-2-symmetry-and-integrals/#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>[...] substitution , we get . (the last step is due to symmetry, as the integrand is an even function; see here.) Now, by consulting a table of integrals (or via trigonometric substitution), we find that , and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] substitution , we get . (the last step is due to symmetry, as the integrand is an even function; see here.) Now, by consulting a table of integrals (or via trigonometric substitution), we find that , and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 24: Projectile Range by Physics Friday 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2008/06/13/physics-friday-24-projectile-range/#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 95 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=428#comment-1810</guid>
		<description>[...] not the distance along the ground to the impact point, and so differs from the h=0 case of Physics Friday 24.   The only acceleration is due to gravity; so our basic kinematic equations tell us that  and . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not the distance along the ground to the impact point, and so differs from the h=0 case of Physics Friday 24.   The only acceleration is due to gravity; so our basic kinematic equations tell us that  and . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 93 by Monday Math 94 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/monday-math-93/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 94 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/monday-math-93/#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>[...] here I showed that the Dirichlet series generating function for &#124;&#956;&#124; is . I also demonstrated here that &#124;&#956;&#124; and the Liouville function lambda(n) are Dirichlet inverses, so we can see that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here I showed that the Dirichlet series generating function for |&mu;| is . I also demonstrated here that |&mu;| and the Liouville function lambda(n) are Dirichlet inverses, so we can see that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 88 by Monday Math 94 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/monday-math-88/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 94 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1675#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>[...] which have Dirichlet series generating functions  and , respectively. You may also recall that here I showed that the Dirichlet series generating function for &#124;&#956;&#124; is . I also demonstrated here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which have Dirichlet series generating functions  and , respectively. You may also recall that here I showed that the Dirichlet series generating function for |&mu;| is . I also demonstrated here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 92 by Monday Math 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/monday-math-92/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1730#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>[...] Math&#160;93 By twistedone151  Last Monday, I discussed the Dirichlet inverse. I showed that the Dirichlet inverse can be found by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Math&nbsp;93 By twistedone151  Last Monday, I discussed the Dirichlet inverse. I showed that the Dirichlet inverse can be found by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 85 by Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/physics-friday-85/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1620#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>[...] neglecting the ground state. First, let us examine the spacing between the energy levels. For our quantum particle in a box, we have energy levels , where nx, ny, and nz are positive integers. Using , we rewrite as . The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] neglecting the ground state. First, let us examine the spacing between the energy levels. For our quantum particle in a box, we have energy levels , where nx, ny, and nz are positive integers. Using , we rewrite as . The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 73 by Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/physics-friday-73/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1515#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>[...] the energy. For T&gt;Tc, we have as before, . For T&lt;Tc, we have .  From this, we find the heat capacity at constant volume by . Below the condensation temperature, we take the derivative of the above, to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the energy. For T&gt;Tc, we have as before, . For T&lt;Tc, we have .  From this, we find the heat capacity at constant volume by . Below the condensation temperature, we take the derivative of the above, to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 92 by Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/physics-friday-92/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 93 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1724#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday&#160;93 By twistedone151  Continuing from last Friday, we now find the behavior of an ideal Bose gas at a temperature below the condensation temperature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday&nbsp;93 By twistedone151  Continuing from last Friday, we now find the behavior of an ideal Bose gas at a temperature below the condensation temperature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday Math 91 by Monday Math 92 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/monday-math-91/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Math 92 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/monday-math-91/#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>[...] Math&#160;92 By twistedone151  Last Monday, I discussed the Dirichlet convolution. We noted that it is commutative, associative, and has an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Math&nbsp;92 By twistedone151  Last Monday, I discussed the Dirichlet convolution. We noted that it is commutative, associative, and has an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics Friday 91 by Physics Friday 92 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/physics-friday-91/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Friday 92 &#171; Twisted One 151&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twistedone151.wordpress.com/?p=1712#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday&#160;92 By twistedone151  Last week, we began modeling the ideal Bose gas, including showing that it possesses the same classical limit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday&nbsp;92 By twistedone151  Last week, we began modeling the ideal Bose gas, including showing that it possesses the same classical limit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
