Physics Friday 22: Quantum Bouncing Ball (Part 1/?)

Part 1: Setup and energy eigenvalues

Classically, we can describe a perfectly elastic vertically bouncing ball as the vertical motion under a constant gravitational force, with conserved energy, and an absolute barrier at z=0. To produce the quantum description, we need fo find the proper potential energy V(z) to plug into the Hamiltonian operator, and thus Schrödinger’s equation. As we have a perfect barrier at z=0, and the region z<0 is totally forbidden, we need V(z) to be infinite in that region. For z>0, the potential energy is simply mgz. Combining these, we obtain a triangular well:
Thus we have for z≤0, remembering that the wavefunction must be continuous at z=0.

Now, plugging this into the time-independent Schrödinger equation, we have

so for z≥0, we have:

Thus, we have the second-order linear differential equation for φ

Defining constants and , we can write this as:

Making the substitution gives us , which is Airy’s equation. The linearly independent solutions are the Airy functions. Normalization of the wavefunction requires that as , so we only have the Airy function Ai(u). Thus we see that the equation has solution:
for z>0, where C is a constant such as to normalize the wavefunction (that is, so that ). Plugging in the definitions of λ and k, we obtain:

But we also have the requirement that when z=0. This means that we only have certain allowed energy eigenvalues , such that
, or thus , where an is the nth zero of the Airy function Ai (in decending order, as they are negative). Approximate values of the first few zeroes are as follows:

Approximate values of the zeros of Ai(x)
n an
1 -2.33811
2 -4.08795
3 -5.52056
4 -6.78671
5 -7.94413

As , , which tells us that for large n,
, and thus the higher energy levels can be approximated as:


Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Physics Friday 22: Quantum Bouncing Ball (Part 1/?)”

  1. Physics Friday 23: Quantum Bouncing Ball (Part 2/2) « Twisted One 151’s Weblog Says:

    […] Ball (Part 2/2) Quantum Bouncing Ball Part 2: Probability Density and the Classical Limit. (Part 1) First, we note the spacing between the nodes of the wavefunction. As noted for large n, , meaning […]

  2. Lester D. Hulett Says:

    I have looked far and wide on the internet to find a layman’s derivation of the Airy solutions for the bouncing ball. This is the best I’ve seen. I assume you have seen the Nesvixhevski experiments on the bouncing neutron that show that the neutron’s vertical motion is quantized. Let us hear your comments on this. I think this experiment will take its place in the basic physics curricula. Your quick and easy derivation of the Airy function will make neat supplement in the basic physics books.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: