**Quantum Mechanics and Momentum**

Part 4: The Momentum Operator

Frequently, the quantum mechanical operator for momentum is simply presented to students without justification (that was my experience, at least). However, use of our previous developments in Fourier transforms and observables allow us to see a (non-rigorous) justification of the momentum operator for wavefunctions represented in position space.

Let us consider a one-dimensional problem, with a particle described by the (position domain) wavefunction *ψ*(*x*). As previously, we can define a Fourier transform of this to the (angular) wavenumber domain, *φ*(*k*):

Now, as we noted previously, the relation shows that the wavenumber domain represents momentum space.

Now, recall that for an observable with (Hermitian) operator and (position space) wavefunction *ψ*(*x*), the expectation value of the observable is

For example, the expectation value for the position is

,

where ^{*} indicates the complex conjugate.

Expectation of a function of momentum *g*(*p*) can be found in the wavefunction domain as

and so

(Just as multiplication by *x* is the position operator is position space, multiplication by is the momentum operator in momentum space.)

If we wish to write this in terms of *ψ*(*x*), we start from our Fourier transform:

.

Taking the complex conjugate,

Now, we know that the Fourier transform of the derivative of a function obeys the rule:

and thus we see that as , then

Combining these, and remembering the delta “function” relation we used in proving Plancherel’s Theorem, we have:

.

Comparing this to our operator expectation value

which implies that the operator is the momentum operator for wavefunctions in the position domain. Similar arguments can show that the position operator in the frequency domain is .

For three dimensions, we have momentum vector , which gives us vector-valued momentum operator

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Tags: Expected Value, Fourier Transform, Friday Physics, Momentum, Momentum Space, Operator, physics, Quantum Mechanics

This entry was posted on November 21, 2008 at 12:02 am and is filed under Math/Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

December 5, 2008 at 12:17 am |

[…] Mechanics and Momentum Part 6: Time, Frequency, and Schrödinger’s Equation Note that previously, we combined the deBroglie relation between momentum and (angular) wavenumber, the Fourier […]

August 14, 2009 at 12:37 am |

[…] , we get normalized wavefunction . Now, let us consider the momentum. The one-dimensional quantum momentum operator is , and we see ; our energy eigenstates are obviously not momentum eigenstates. However, note that […]