Part 8: Work, Induction, and Magnetic Energy Density

Previously, we derived the energy density of the electric field by considering the work done in assembling a charge distribution from infinite separation, with the assembly done slowly enough as to be a quasi-static system. While we can find the energy density of the magnetic field by considering the work done in forming a particular current density, we cannot do so using magnetostatics; we must use Faraday’s Law of induction.

First, consider a circuit with a constant current *I*. If the flux *Φ* through the circuit changes, then an electromotive force will be generated around the circuit. This will change the current in the circuit; to oppose this, and keep the current constant, the current source must do work. As we found here, the power delivered to a current (work per unit time) by a voltage *V* is *P*=*IV*. Thus, the emf does work per unit time of , and so the work per unit time needed to oppose this and keep the current constant is . Now, Faraday’s Law tells us that (using SI units) . Thus, our current source delivers power ; or, in terms of differentials, a small change in flux *δΦ* is countered by work .

Next, consider a system of *n* circuits, with respective currents *I _{i}*,

*i*=1,2,…,

*n*. Then the flux in the

*i*th circuit is

where

*d*

**S**

*is the vector surface element for a surface bounded by the*

_{i}*i*th circuit (I’ve used

*d*

**S**rather than the usual

*d*

**A**to avoid confusion with the magnetic vector potential

**A**).

Now, as we noted here, the definition of the vector potential combined with the Kelvin-Stokes theorem tell us that

,

where

*d*

**s**

*is a vector line element of the*

_{i}*i*th circuit.

Thus, by the above single-circuit case, when there is a change in the magnetic field, and thus the fluxes, the current source of current

*I*to maintain the current must deliver power equal to

_{i}.

So, then the total work necessary to take these

*n*circuits from zero current to some final values a time

*T*later, is

.

Now, the result should be independent of the particular “path” through intermediate values, so to simplify, we ramp up the currents proportionally, so that there is some increasing function of time

*f*(

*t*), with

*f*(0)=0 and , with some constants of proportionality

*c*, for all

_{i}*i*=1,2,…,

*n*. The key then, is to note that the magnetic field generated by a current has magnitude proportional to that current, and so

**B**will be linearly proportional to

*f*(

*t*), and thus all the

*Φ*will be proportional to

_{i}*f*(

*t*). Thus, dubbing the constants of this latter proportionality by

*k*,

_{i}and so

. Since the final values of the current and flux are , and , respectively, this says that for proportional ramp-up,

, and so the work in setting up these currents is

,

and thus, for

*n*circuits with currents

*I*and fluxes

_{i}*Φ*, the energy stored is

_{i},

and using our expression for flux in terms of the line integral of the vector potential,

.

Now, let us instead consider a continuous current distribution, with current density

**J**. As we did in our argument here, we break up the distribution into elemental current loops. An elemental loop will have a path

*C*with line element

*d*

**s**parallel to the local current density, so that

*J*

*d*

**s**=

**J**

*ds*; and we have a small perpendicular cross-section

*Δσ*, so that the current in the loop is

*I*=

*JΔσ*. Thus, the contribution to the total stored energy by this element is

;

but, as we noted in our argument here,

*JΔσ*

*d*

**s**=

**J**

*Δσ*

*ds*=

**J**

*d*

^{3}

*r*, and so the sum over all of these elemental loops becomes a volume integral:

.

Now, recall that Ampère’s Law states that

, and so, using this to replace the current density in the above, we see

.

Now, the product rule for the divergence of a cross product states that for two vector fields

**v**and

**w**,

.

Letting

**v**be

**B**and

**w**be

**A**, and solving for the first term on the right-hand side, we see

,

and so

.

This second term is the volume integral of a divergence; thus, by the divergence theorem,

, where

*S*is the surface bounding our volume of integration. Now, a realistic current distribution can be expected to be of finite spatial extent; thus, as we expand our volume, the surface will eventually come to be far from the current distribution. As we noted here, for distant fields, the dipole term dominates, and the vector potential goes as

*r*

^{-2}, and the field goes as

*r*

^{-3}; thus, their cross product will have a magnitude that goes as

*r*

^{-5}, while the surface of integration has area that goes as

*r*

^{2}; thus, as the volume is expanded to all space, this surface integral will go to zero, and we get

. But from the definition of the vector potential, , so the above is

, and we identify the quantity being integrated over all space as the energy density of the magnetic field: .

Compare this to the energy density of the electric field, .

Tags: Electric Current, Electricity & Magnetism, Energy, Friday Physics, Induction, physics, Vector Potential, work

August 13, 2010 at 12:33 am |

[…] with the curl, we use the product rule for divergence of a cross product (similar to our usage here, albeit with E instead of A): . Now, Faraday’s Law gives us the curl of the electric field: ; […]

September 17, 2010 at 2:19 pm |

[…] case in each of those limits. Also, since the energy density for electric fields is , and the energy density for magnetic fields is . Applying these to our wave, and taking the time average over a cycle, the average energy […]